3 min read
• Aug. 26, 2024Projections vs. scenarios
3 min read
• Aug. 26, 2024Projections vs. Scenarios: what’s the difference?
A projection like the Outlook starts with current factors such as public policy and commercially available technology and then evaluates how they might change over time. In contrast, many scenarios start with a hypothetical outcome and work backward to identify the factors that need to occur to achieve that outcome. Both are important views. Back-casted scenarios help society understand the actions that may be needed to achieve a hypothetical outcome while projections help society understand the current path.
How do scenarios inform?
ExxonMobil considers a range of scenarios – including those we view as remote – to help inform the company’s strategic thinking. No single pathway can be reasonably predicted, given the wide range of uncertainties. Key unknowns include yet-to-be-developed government policies and advances in technology that may influence the cost, pace, and potential availability of certain pathways. Scenarios that employ a full complement of technology options are likely to provide the most economically efficient pathways. What also remains uncertain is how quickly and to what extent businesses and consumers will be willing to pay for carbon reductions in the products and services they use, which is essential to creating a market that incentivizes an accelerated path to net zero.
Unlike the company’s Outlook, many scenarios, such as the IPCC Likely Below 2°C start with a hypothetical outcome and work backward to identify the factors that need to occur to achieve that outcome.
Views to 2050: Different Assumptions Produce Dramatically Different Paths
Global energy-related emissions
CO2 Billion metric tons
Views of the future path of the world’s energy system and emissions levels can be grouped into two categories.
- Society’s Current Trajectory
- ExxonMobil’s Global Outlook bases its view of energy demand and supply through 2050 on observable trends in population, economic development, policy, technology and consumer preferences.
- The International Energy Agency’s Stated Energy Policies Scenario (STEPS) reflects a sector-by-sector assessment of current policy in place or announced by governments around the world.
- Paris-Aligned Scenarios
- The U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) database contains 311 scenarios defined as pathways with a 67% likelihood of limiting peak warming to below 2°C throughout the 21st century. These are labelled IPCC Likely Below 2°C scenarios.
- The International Energy Agency’s Announced Pledges Scenario (APS) assumes that all aspirational targets announced by governments are met on time and in full, including their long-term net zero and energy access goals.
It is important to note that according to the U.N. Environment Programme Emissions Gap Report, the current Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) to emissions reductions that countries have pledged to make by 2030 are not yet within a Likely Below 2°C pathway. It further states that G20 members as a group do not have policies in place to achieve their current NDCs.
ExxonMobil’s view is that while any one scenario may be remote in probability, all of these projections and scenarios are useful in informing the company’s long-term strategic thinking.
Sustainability and reports
Explore more
ExxonMobil Global Outlook Executive Summary: Our view to 2050
7 min read
• Aug. 26, 2024
Energy demand drivers
2 min read
• Aug. 26, 2024Energy demand trends
4 min read
• Aug. 26, 2024
ExxonMobil Global Outlook:
Our view to 2050
Energy transition progress
4 min read
• Aug. 26, 2024About the ExxonMobil Global Outlook
4 min read
• Aug. 26, 2024Cautionary statement
The Global Outlook includes Exxon Mobil Corporation’s internal estimates of both historical levels and projections of challenging topics such as energy demand, supply, and trends through 2050 based upon internal data and analyses as well as publicly available information from many external sources including the International Energy Agency. Separate from ExxonMobil’s analysis, we discuss a number of third-party scenarios such as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Likely Below 2°C and the International Energy Agency scenarios. Third-party scenarios discussed in this report reflect the modeling assumptions and outputs of their respective authors, not ExxonMobil, and their use and inclusion herein is not an endorsement by ExxonMobil of their results, likelihood or probability. Work on the Outlook and report was conducted during 2023 and 2024. The report contains forward looking statements, including projections, targets, expectations, estimates and assumptions of future behaviors. Actual future conditions and results (including energy demand, energy supply, the growth of energy demand and supply, the impact of new technologies, the relative mix of energy across sources, economic sectors and geographic regions, imports and exports of energy, emissions and plans to reduce emissions) could differ materially due to changes in economic conditions, the ability to scale new technologies on a cost-effective basis, unexpected technological developments, the development of new supply sources, changes in law or government policy, political events, demographic changes and migration patterns, trade patterns, the development and enforcement of global, regional or national mandates, changes in consumer preferences, and other factors discussed herein and under the heading “Factors Affecting Future Results” in the Investors section of our website at www.exxonmobil.com. The Outlook was published in August 2024. ExxonMobil assumes no duty to update these statements or materials as of any future date, and neither future distribution of this material nor the continued availability of this material in archive form on our website should be deemed to constitute an update or re-affirmation of this material as of any future date. This material is not to be used or reproduced without the permission of Exxon Mobil Corporation. All rights reserved.